[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16194720#comment-16194720
 ] 

Vikas Saurabh commented on OAK-6550:
------------------------------------

Follow up to previous comment - this is the warn noticed during blob store 
consistency check:
{noformat}
06.10.2017 13:41:55.392 *INFO* [sling-oak-observation-41359] 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.blob.MarkSweepGarbageCollector Number of 
blobs present in BlobStore : [410869]
06.10.2017 13:41:55.392 *INFO* [sling-oak-observation-41359] 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.blob.MarkSweepGarbageCollector Length of blob 
ids file retrieved 28896382
06.10.2017 13:41:56.810 *INFO* [sling-oak-observation-41346] 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.blob.MarkSweepGarbageCollector Consistency 
check found [136002] missing blobs
06.10.2017 13:41:56.811 *WARN* [sling-oak-observation-41346] 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.blob.MarkSweepGarbageCollector Consistency 
check failure in the the blob store : DataStore backed BlobStore 
[org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.blob.datastore.OakFileDataStore], check 
missing candidates in file /tmp/gcworkdir-1507296968243/gccand-1507296968243
{noformat}

> Make BlobTracker snaphot process smarter
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-6550
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6550
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: blob-plugins
>            Reporter: Amit Jain
>            Assignee: Amit Jain
>             Fix For: 1.8
>
>
> Currently, the BlobTracker snapshot() process is scheduled (every 12 hours by 
> default) which synchronizes the local additions & deletions since last change 
> with the datastore and consequently other cluster nodes.
> The process should be slightly improved to run the sync on every removal i.e. 
> either through :
> * Blob GC
> * Active Deletion
> And add some heuristic (most likely time based) to skip an upcoming sync 
> cycle if it makes sense.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to