[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16198394#comment-16198394
]
Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-6797:
---------------------------------------
My preferred approach is:
- Fix the Condition JavaDoc. Both EXISTS and MISSING conditions may also be
used for top level non-revision properties.
- Limit the conditional DocumentStore.remove() contract to only support
conditions on non-revision properties.
- Change the DocumentStore implementations accordingly. I.e. throw an exception
when a remove condition is for a revision property.
[~reschke], WDYT?
> DocumentStore conditional remove: EXISTS on non-revision property?
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-6797
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6797
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: documentmk
> Reporter: Julian Reschke
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OAK-6797.diff
>
>
> Implementations currently differ in whether the "Exists" condition works on a
> non-revision property.
> (RDBDS and MongoDS seem to support it, while MemoryDS does not).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
