[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16233793#comment-16233793
]
Vikas Saurabh edited comment on OAK-6735 at 11/1/17 1:43 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------
Fixed on trunk at [r1813955|https://svn.apache.org/r1813955].
Incorporated [~chetanm]'s feedback (offline) at
[r1813973|https://svn.apache.org/r1813973].
was (Author: catholicon):
Fixed on trunk at [r1813955|https://svn.apache.org/r1813955].
> Lucene Index: improved cost estimation by using document count per field
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-6735
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6735
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: lucene, query
> Affects Versions: 1.7.4
> Reporter: Thomas Mueller
> Assignee: Vikas Saurabh
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.8, 1.7.11
>
> Attachments: IndexReadPattern.txt, LuceneIndexReadPattern.java,
> OAK-6735.patch
>
>
> The cost estimation of the Lucene index is somewhat inaccurate because (by
> default) it just used the number of documents in the index (as of Oak 1.7.4
> by default, due to OAK-6333).
> Instead, it should use the number of documents for the given fields (the
> minimum, if there are multiple fields with restrictions).
> Plus divided by the number of restrictions (as we do now already).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
