[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Michael Dürig updated OAK-6674:
-------------------------------
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 1.7.11)
                   1.7.12

> Create a more complex IT for cold standby
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-6674
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6674
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: segment-tar, tarmk-standby
>            Reporter: Andrei Dulceanu
>            Assignee: Andrei Dulceanu
>              Labels: cold-standby
>             Fix For: 1.8, 1.7.12
>
>
> At the moment all integration tests for cold standby are using the same 
> scenario in their tests: some content is created on the server (including 
> binaries), a standby sync cycle is started and then the content is checked on 
> the client. The only twist here is using/not using a data store for storing 
> binaries.
> Although good, this model could be extended to cover many more cases. For 
> example, {{StandbyDiff}} covers the following 6 cases node/property 
> added/changed/deleted. From these, with the scenario described, the removal 
> part is never tested (and the change part is covered in only one test). 
> It would be nice to have an IT which would add content on the server, do a 
> sync, remove some of the content, do a sync and then call OnRC. This way all 
> cases will be covered, including if cleanup works as expected on the client.
> /cc [~frm]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to