[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16298251#comment-16298251
]
Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-6674:
---------------------------------------
[~dulceanu], we are approaching the 1.8 release, do you still want to include
this in the release? Otherwise please re-schedule.
> Create a more complex IT for cold standby
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-6674
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6674
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: segment-tar, tarmk-standby
> Reporter: Andrei Dulceanu
> Assignee: Andrei Dulceanu
> Labels: cold-standby
> Fix For: 1.8
>
>
> At the moment all integration tests for cold standby are using the same
> scenario in their tests: some content is created on the server (including
> binaries), a standby sync cycle is started and then the content is checked on
> the client. The only twist here is using/not using a data store for storing
> binaries.
> Although good, this model could be extended to cover many more cases. For
> example, {{StandbyDiff}} covers the following 6 cases node/property
> added/changed/deleted. From these, with the scenario described, the removal
> part is never tested (and the change part is covered in only one test).
> It would be nice to have an IT which would add content on the server, do a
> sync, remove some of the content, do a sync and then call OnRC. This way all
> cases will be covered, including if cleanup works as expected on the client.
> /cc [~frm]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
