[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16490687#comment-16490687
 ] 

Alex Deparvu commented on OAK-7499:
-----------------------------------

my counter proposal is [0], based on your patch but I did my best to not 
introduce another bundle as I found it has too many similarities with existing 
{{oak-core-spi}}. unfortunately the downside is that the type predicate code 
ended up in {{oak-store-spi}} due to dependency on NodeState & friends. (there 
is also a dependency on OAK-7510).

in the end I have no strong preference, it's a new bundle vs a package that is 
in a weirdish location.



[0] 
https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/compare/trunk...stillalex:oak-7499-t0

> Dependencies on various 'plugins'
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-7499
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7499
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: angela
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: OAK-7499-adjustsecuritycode.patch, 
> OAK-7499-extractplugins.patch
>
>
> subtask of OAK-7498 to drop usage of plugin classes directly from security 
> code base:
> - extract interfaces for managers and provider services
> - replace usage of implementenations



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to