[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16724870#comment-16724870 ]
Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-7924: ------------------------------------- I assume you recommend using merge policy "mitigated" and coded "compressingCodec"? I assume this isn't the default yet, but it can be set in the index definition (the coded, and the merge policy)? > Reduce Lucene index size footprint with compressing Codec > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: OAK-7924 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7924 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: lucene > Reporter: Tommaso Teofili > Assignee: Tommaso Teofili > Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.9.14 > > Attachments: OAK-7924.0.patch > > > In OAK-5192 I had developed a test codec to benchmark all possible space > savings options before diving into a custom {{MergePolicy}}. > The codec developed back then could be used to reduce the index size > footprint both on disk and on node store implementations. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)