[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16724870#comment-16724870
 ] 

Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-7924:
-------------------------------------

I assume you recommend using merge policy "mitigated" and coded 
"compressingCodec"? I assume this isn't the default yet, but it can be set in 
the index definition (the coded, and the merge policy)?

> Reduce Lucene index size footprint with compressing Codec
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-7924
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7924
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: lucene
>            Reporter: Tommaso Teofili
>            Assignee: Tommaso Teofili
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.9.14
>
>         Attachments: OAK-7924.0.patch
>
>
> In OAK-5192 I had developed a test codec to benchmark all possible space 
> savings options before diving into a custom {{MergePolicy}}.
> The codec developed back then could be used to reduce the index size 
> footprint both on disk and on node store implementations.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to