[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16881193#comment-16881193
]
Julian Reschke edited comment on OAK-8448 at 7/29/19 2:08 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------
trunk: (1.16.0) [r1862806|http://svn.apache.org/r1862806]
[r1862537|http://svn.apache.org/r1862537]
1.10: [r1863942|http://svn.apache.org/r1863942]
was (Author: reschke):
trunk: [r1862806|http://svn.apache.org/r1862806]
[r1862537|http://svn.apache.org/r1862537]
> VersionGC may get stuck at 60s scope
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-8448
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8448
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: documentmk
> Affects Versions: 1.8.9
> Reporter: Julian Reschke
> Assignee: Julian Reschke
> Priority: Major
> Labels: candidate_oak_1_8
> Fix For: 1.16.0, 1.10.4
>
> Attachments: OAK-8448.diff, test.diff
>
>
> It seems that if the VersionGarbageCollector reduces the scope to a 60s
> interval, it'll never change it back to a bigger interval. This is because
> the collectLimit gets set to 0:
> {noformat}
> if (scope.getDurationMs() <= options.precisionMs) {
> // If we have narrowed the collect time interval down as much
> as we can, no
> // longer enforce a limit. We need to get through this.
> collectLimit = 0;
> log.debug("time interval <= precision ({} ms), disabling
> collection limits", options.precisionMs);
> }
> {noformat}
> ...and later on this is interpreted as "there were no restrictions in the
> prior run that need to be updated":
> {noformat}
> if (maxCollect <= 0) {
> log.debug("successful run without effective limit,
> keeping recommendations");
> }
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)
