[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17011603#comment-17011603
]
Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-8280:
---------------------------------------
Looks good to me, but would be good to have someone review it that knows this
area better than me.
The only thing I noticed, package
{{org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.blob.datastore.directaccess}} gets a
package-info.java. Does it need one and why is it different from the other two
exported packages? Did the baseline plugin complain and the package should
rather be added to the list of filtered packages of the baseline plugin in
oak-parent/pom.xml?
> [Direct Binary Access] Allow client to veto use of CDN URI
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-8280
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8280
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: blob-cloud, blob-cloud-azure
> Reporter: Matt Ryan
> Assignee: Matt Ryan
> Priority: Major
>
> As we learned in OAK-7702, using signed CDN URIs usually offers improved
> throughput, but not always. Implementing this issue would mean that we
> extend the API to allow a client to indicate that they do not want the CDN
> URI, even if a CDN is configured, because the client somehow knows that the
> non-CDN URI will be better.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
