[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17030632#comment-17030632
]
Amrit Verma commented on OAK-8711:
----------------------------------
Attached the patch [^OAK-8711.patch] from the PR. The PR branch has become
inconsistent somehow after doing steps mentioned in "Producing a patch against
trunk" on the page
[https://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/developing-with-git.html] . This is
probably due to the step `git svn rebase`. The patch is clean.
> Queries with facets should not use traversal
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-8711
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8711
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Nitin Gupta
> Assignee: Nitin Gupta
> Priority: Major
> Labels: amrit
> Attachments: OAK-8711.patch
>
>
> Consider a scenario where a query is there with facets and the traversal cost
> is less than the index cost that serves the facet query . This would be
> problematic.
>
> In this case we should maybe set the traversal cost to infinity so that
> traversal is not an option for queries with facets.
>
> In case there is no index available to serve this faceted query we can
> probably throw an exception with a meaningful message .
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
