[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17030632#comment-17030632 ]
Amrit Verma commented on OAK-8711: ---------------------------------- Attached the patch [^OAK-8711.patch] from the PR. The PR branch has become inconsistent somehow after doing steps mentioned in "Producing a patch against trunk" on the page [https://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/developing-with-git.html] . This is probably due to the step `git svn rebase`. The patch is clean. > Queries with facets should not use traversal > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: OAK-8711 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8711 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Nitin Gupta > Assignee: Nitin Gupta > Priority: Major > Labels: amrit > Attachments: OAK-8711.patch > > > Consider a scenario where a query is there with facets and the traversal cost > is less than the index cost that serves the facet query . This would be > problematic. > > In this case we should maybe set the traversal cost to infinity so that > traversal is not an option for queries with facets. > > In case there is no index available to serve this faceted query we can > probably throw an exception with a meaningful message . -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)