[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Matt Ryan updated OAK-9304:
---------------------------
    Description: 
When generating a direct download URI for a filename with certain non-standard 
characters in the name, it can cause the resulting signed URI to be considered 
invalid by some blob storage services (Azure in particular).  This can lead to 
blob storage services being unable to service the URl request.

The "filename" portion of the Content-Disposition needs to be ISO-8859-1 
encoded, per [https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6266#section-4.3] in this 
paragraph:
{quote}The parameters "filename" and "filename*" differ only in that 
"filename*" uses the encoding defined in RFC5987, allowing the use of 
characters not present in the ISO-8859-1 character set ISO-8859-1.
{quote}
This is not usually a problem, but if the filename provided contains 
non-standard characters, it can cause the resulting signed URI to be invalid.  
This can lead to blob storage services being unable to service the URl request.

For example, a filename of "Ausländische.jpg" currently requests a 
Content-Disposition header that looks like:
{noformat}
inline; filename="Ausländische.jpg"; filename*=UTF-8''Ausla%CC%88ndische.jpg 
{noformat}
It instead should look like:
{noformat}
inline; filename="Ausla?ndische.jpg"; filename*=UTF-8''Ausla%CC%88ndische.jpg 
{noformat}
 

The "filename" portion of the Content-Disposition needs to consist of 
ISO-8859-1 characters, per [https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6266#section-4.3] in 
this paragraph:
{quote}The parameters "filename" and "filename*" differ only in that 
"filename*" uses the encoding defined in RFC5987, allowing the use of 
characters not present in the ISO-8859-1 character set ISO-8859-1.
{quote}
By encoding the "filename" portion using standard Java character set encoding 
conversion (e.g. {{ 

  was:
The "filename" portion of the Content-Disposition needs to be ISO-8859-1 
encoded, per [https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6266#section-4.3] in this 
paragraph:
{quote}The parameters "filename" and "filename*" differ only in that 
"filename*" uses the encoding defined in RFC5987, allowing the use of 
characters not present in the ISO-8859-1 character set ISO-8859-1.
{quote}
This is not usually a problem, but if the filename provided contains 
non-standard characters, it can cause the resulting signed URI to be invalid.  
This can lead to blob storage services being unable to service the URl request.

For example, a filename of "Ausländische.jpg" currently requests a 
Content-Disposition header that looks like:
{noformat}
inline; filename="Ausländische.jpg"; filename*=UTF-8''Ausla%CC%88ndische.jpg 
{noformat}
It instead should look like:
{noformat}
inline; filename="Ausla?ndische.jpg"; filename*=UTF-8''Ausla%CC%88ndische.jpg 
{noformat}
 

 


> Filename with special characters in direct download URI Content-Disposition 
> are causing HTTP 400 errors from Azure
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-9304
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9304
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: blob-cloud, blob-cloud-azure, blob-plugins
>    Affects Versions: 1.36.0
>            Reporter: Matt Ryan
>            Assignee: Matt Ryan
>            Priority: Major
>
> When generating a direct download URI for a filename with certain 
> non-standard characters in the name, it can cause the resulting signed URI to 
> be considered invalid by some blob storage services (Azure in particular).  
> This can lead to blob storage services being unable to service the URl 
> request.
> The "filename" portion of the Content-Disposition needs to be ISO-8859-1 
> encoded, per [https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6266#section-4.3] in this 
> paragraph:
> {quote}The parameters "filename" and "filename*" differ only in that 
> "filename*" uses the encoding defined in RFC5987, allowing the use of 
> characters not present in the ISO-8859-1 character set ISO-8859-1.
> {quote}
> This is not usually a problem, but if the filename provided contains 
> non-standard characters, it can cause the resulting signed URI to be invalid. 
>  This can lead to blob storage services being unable to service the URl 
> request.
> For example, a filename of "Ausländische.jpg" currently requests a 
> Content-Disposition header that looks like:
> {noformat}
> inline; filename="Ausländische.jpg"; filename*=UTF-8''Ausla%CC%88ndische.jpg 
> {noformat}
> It instead should look like:
> {noformat}
> inline; filename="Ausla?ndische.jpg"; filename*=UTF-8''Ausla%CC%88ndische.jpg 
> {noformat}
>  
> The "filename" portion of the Content-Disposition needs to consist of 
> ISO-8859-1 characters, per [https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6266#section-4.3] 
> in this paragraph:
> {quote}The parameters "filename" and "filename*" differ only in that 
> "filename*" uses the encoding defined in RFC5987, allowing the use of 
> characters not present in the ISO-8859-1 character set ISO-8859-1.
> {quote}
> By encoding the "filename" portion using standard Java character set encoding 
> conversion (e.g. {{ 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to