[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17274453#comment-17274453
]
Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-9341:
-------------------------------------
Please note it's a big dangerous now to change the behavior... we might break
existing indexes if we do.
> Unversioned index is getting used even if it doesn't have mutable content
> index data
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-9341
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9341
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: indexing
> Reporter: Amrit Verma
> Priority: Major
>
> While using a composite node store, if an index doesn't specify a version in
> its name e.g. {{/oak:index/lucene}} it gets considered for use in a query
> even if it doesn't have the oak mount index data.
> This the probably due to the reason that `isIndexActive` check is only
> performed for the versioned indices here -
> https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/blob/08c7b20e0676739d9c445b5249c3f71004b6b894/oak-search/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/index/search/spi/query/IndexName.java#L208-L215
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
