[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9562?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17407293#comment-17407293
]
Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-9562:
---------------------------------------
bq. Do you mean the condition "nd.hasBinary() != 1" ?
The entire condition whether to set the hasBinary (aka _bin) flag.
bq. something like this should work fine:
{noformat}
+ for (String path : this.nodesWithBinaries) {
+ NodeDocument.setHasBinary(getUpdateOperationForNode(path));
+ }
{noformat}
Yes, this is also what I had in mind. Thanks for the quick feedback. I'm
currently testing this.
> Missing _bin when node is recreated after revision GC
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-9562
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9562
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: documentmk
> Affects Versions: 1.6.0, 1.8.0, 1.22.0, 1.40.0
> Reporter: Marcel Reutegger
> Assignee: Marcel Reutegger
> Priority: Major
>
> When a node with a binary property is recreated after a revision GC
> operation, it may happen that the document for the node is missing the _bin
> flag. A subsequent blob store garbage collection then removes the blob.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
