[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9715?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Thomas Mueller reassigned OAK-9715:
-----------------------------------

    Assignee: Thomas Mueller

> IndexDefMergerUtils Uses Incorrect Index Name for merges Property
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-9715
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9715
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: oak-run
>    Affects Versions: 1.42.0
>            Reporter: Dan Klco
>            Assignee: Thomas Mueller
>            Priority: Major
>
> *Problem*
> The IndexDefMergerUtils uses the ancestorName and customName values for 
> setting the merges property when merging an index instead of the latest 
> product Index Name and custom name.
> *Example*
> Given the following indexes:
> newIndexes: [index-2]
> allIndexes: [index-1, index-1-custom-1]
> Calling IndexDefMergerUtils.merge(newIndexes, allIndexes) would result in an 
> index with the property:
> index-2-custom-1: {
>   merges: [index-1, index-1-custom-1] 
> }
> *Result*
> When the new index-2 definition is loaded, the index-1 definition in the 
> repository will be superseded and no longer be active. Since the [IndexName 
> class|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/blob/45e05adb16ce65b2867b0de48a86291a8f01720d/oak-search/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/index/search/spi/query/IndexName.java#L248]
>  will only consider an index active if every index it references in the 
> merges property is either active, disabled or removed, the new 
> index-2-custom-1 index will not be active and therefore not considered for 
> queries.
> *Expected Result*
> The merged index will be created in a way that the new custom indexes are 
> considered for queries once the merged version of the base index is active. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

Reply via email to