[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9765?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17534695#comment-17534695
]
Amit Jain commented on OAK-9765:
--------------------------------
[~piercarlo_s] Do take a look at the test which runs GC on Segment store before
doing data store GC
*
[https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/blob/trunk/oak-segment-tar/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/segment/SegmentDataStoreBlobGCIT.java#L218-L223]
* Also, need to create enough garbage in the segment store so that the segment
GC is effective -
[https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/blob/trunk/oak-segment-tar/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/segment/SegmentDataStoreBlobGCIT.java#L157-L166]
> Garbage Collection does not remove blobs file from the file system
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-9765
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9765
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 1.42.0
> Reporter: Piercarlo Slavazza
> Priority: Blocker
>
> Using a NodeStore backed by a FileStore, with a blob store of type
> FileBlobStore:
> # (having configured GC with estimation {_}disabled{_})
> # a file is added as a blob
> # then the node where the blob is references is _removed_
> # then the GC is run
> # expected behaviour: the node is no more accessible, _and_ no chunk of the
> blob is present on the file system
> # actual behaviour: the node is no more accessible BUT all the chunks are
> still present on the file system
> Steps to reproduce: execute the (really tiny) main in
> [https://github.com/PiercarloSlavazza/oak-garbage-collection-test/]
> (instructions in the readme)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)
