[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17554534#comment-17554534
 ] 

Angela Schreiber commented on OAK-9798:
---------------------------------------

update: 19e0818dff..7f3916fe08 fixes the accidential use of 
sun.reflect.generics.reflectiveObjects.NotImplementedException in the test 
case. thanks [~thomasm] for pointing it out! that was obviously not intended....

> Inconsistent handling of supported permissions in 
> CompositePermissionProviderOr
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-9798
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9798
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core
>            Reporter: Angela Schreiber
>            Assignee: Angela Schreiber
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.44.0
>
>
> when comparing how {{CompositePermissionProviderOr}} and 
> {{CompositeTreePermissionOr}} handle supported permissions in an aggreggated 
> setup i noticed that {{CompositePermissionProviderOr}} relies on the 
> aggregated providers to verify that permissions are supported upon evaluation 
> of isGranted.
> this contrasts {{CompositeTreePermissionOr}} for which this is not required 
> (as verified by  
> {{CompositeTreePermissionOrTest#testIsGrantedUncoveredPermissions}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)

Reply via email to