[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17755430#comment-17755430
 ] 

Julian Reschke commented on OAK-10406:
--------------------------------------

This currently happens relatively frequently on 
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-trunk/org.apache.jackrabbit$oak-store-document/.

It's not clear to me whether this is new; I'm not aware of any code or test 
changes related to this.

OAK-10405 already fixes a teardown issue, which may cause subsequent problems.

I have a suspicion that the RDB-H2 test can fail if it re-uses an existing 
database (it's file-based). The Mongo-specific code clears the DB, but there's 
no equivalent code for RDB fixture.

> document-store: NodeDocumentSweeperIT.recoveryWithSweepNodeAdded flaky
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-10406
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10406
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Julian Reschke
>            Assignee: Julian Reschke
>            Priority: Major
>
> {noformat}
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.NodeDocumentSweeperIT.recoveryWithSweepNodeAdded[RDBFixture:
>  RDB-H2(file)]
> Schlägt fehl seit 1 Build (Seit
> #1099 )
> Dauer: 0.17 Sekunden.
> Fehlermeldung
> Cluster id 1 has a _lastRev r18a01c9d2f7-0-1 (2023-08-17 04:38:38.583) newer 
> than current time 2023-08-17 04:38:28.585. Please check system time on 
> cluster nodes.
> Stacktrace
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.DocumentStoreException: Cluster id 
> 1 has a _lastRev r18a01c9d2f7-0-1 (2023-08-17 04:38:38.583) newer than 
> current time 2023-08-17 04:38:28.585. Please check system time on cluster 
> nodes.
>       at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.util.Utils.checkRevisionAge(Utils.java:1076)
>       at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.DocumentNodeStore.checkRevisionAge(DocumentNodeStore.java:3117)
>       at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.DocumentNodeStore.<init>(DocumentNodeStore.java:610)
>       at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.DocumentNodeStoreBuilder.build(DocumentNodeStoreBuilder.java:176)
>       at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.DocumentMK$Builder.getNodeStore(DocumentMK.java:481)
>       at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.AbstractTwoNodeTest.setUp(AbstractTwoNodeTest.java:107)
>       at 
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>       at 
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>       at 
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>       at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:59)
>       at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:56)
>       at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.invokeMethod(RunBefores.java:33)
>       at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:24)
>       at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner$1.evaluate(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:100)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:366)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:103)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:63)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413)
>       at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:128)
>       at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:27)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:365)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:273)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:238)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:159)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:384)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:345)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.execute(ForkedBooter.java:126)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:418)
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to