[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6093?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17853709#comment-17853709
 ] 

Julian Reschke commented on OAK-6093:
-------------------------------------

1.8: (1.7.0) 
[b8aa4ca6ac|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/b8aa4ca6ac013c186dcc1cb2017618d0c6777b9f]
 
[ea46d37fee|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/ea46d37fee479f3c44735b2ea47d8185122ac99c]
 
[b02a5fd30c|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/b02a5fd30c930f79234a8c19c80690180e727738]


> Find a new home for NodeUtil and TreeUtil including cleanup
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-6093
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6093
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: core
>            Reporter: Angela Schreiber
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.7.0, 1.8.0
>
>
> see 
> http://markmail.org/message/fczbcadrosg3k6x4?q=ApproximateCounter+list:org%2Eapache%2Ejackrabbit%2Eoak-dev+from:%22Robert+Munteanu%22&page=1
>  for the corresponding discussion.
> As mentioned in the issue and discussed with [~mduerig] in private I would 
> also suggest that we try to get rid of the duplicated functionality. Those 2 
> classes do almost the same thing and I am not totally convinced that we 
> really need to keep both... but I would like to hear other opinions on this.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to