[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-11397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17927361#comment-17927361
]
Julian Reschke edited comment on OAK-11397 at 2/15/25 10:21 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------------
FWIW, the tests that I started to write were just the first thing a could think
of. No intent to break the new stuff at all.
That said, maybe this hints that the two methods maybe should work on names
(Strings) instead of Items?
was (Author: reschke):
FWIW, the tests that are started to write were just the first thing a could
think of. No intent to break the new stuff at all.
That said, maybe this hints that the two methods maybe should work on names
(Strings) instead of Items?
> Provide a way to get expanded names for items
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-11397
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-11397
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core, jackrabbit-api
> Reporter: Konrad Windszus
> Assignee: Konrad Windszus
> Priority: Major
> Labels: namespace
> Fix For: 1.78.0
>
>
> The expanded form name
> (https://developer.adobe.com/experience-manager/reference-materials/spec/jcr/2.0/3_Repository_Model.html#3.2.5.1%20Expanded%20Form)
> is in general more stable than the qualified form, due to global/session
> remappings.
> Therefore it is often beneficial to work with it. Also the JCR API only
> defines constants for the expanded form
> (https://javadoc.io/doc/javax.jcr/jcr/latest/constant-values.html).
> Although all JCR methods taking a JCR name/path accept both forms there are
> edge cases where one doesn't use it as JCR method argument.
> For example when checking if a given node name is contained in a Set of
> literals (e.g. in
> https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault/blob/a2629fd3a24d35f31f0168bd6b8982db6ac62c8b/vault-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/vault/fs/filter/BaseFilter.java#L57).
> Therefore a way to get the expanded form name of a given javax.jcr.Item
> should be provided.
> Compare with the discussion at
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/jkn3fsn4fxovs5v6nygcxorm804hfz8m
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
