[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-11952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18051080#comment-18051080
 ] 

Julian Reschke commented on OAK-11952:
--------------------------------------

There was some discussion about why not to move to Java 21.

The reason for this is that this Oak branch is used in a product that currently 
requires support of Java 17. So the alternative would have been to create 
another maintenance branch.

So Java 21 remains a goal for the hopefully not-so-distant future.

> Bump up minimal Java version to 17
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-11952
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-11952
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: parent
>            Reporter: Julian Reschke
>            Assignee: Julian Reschke
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> Java 11 has been EOLed for quite some time (see 
> [https://endoflife.date/oracle-jdk]).
> More and more third party libraries require Java 17, which stops us from 
> upgrading to the latest and greatest version. In case of critical security 
> issues, that might become a major problem.
> Proposal:
>  - after the next release, switch project version to 2.0.0
>  - set minimal version to Java 17
>  - branch 1.90 in case we need a fix in the Java 11 code base



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to