[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18052560#comment-18052560
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-8840:
-------------------------------------
Use in oak-jcr has been removed with OAK-11972.
->
{noformat}
$ ack --xml "jackrabbit-data"
oak-blob/pom.xml
86: <artifactId>jackrabbit-data</artifactId>
oak-blob-cloud/pom.xml
187: <artifactId>jackrabbit-data</artifactId>
oak-blob-cloud-azure/pom.xml
139: <artifactId>jackrabbit-data</artifactId>
306: <artifactId>jackrabbit-data</artifactId>
oak-blob-plugins/pom.xml
85: <artifactId>jackrabbit-data</artifactId>
oak-it-osgi/test-bundles.xml
45: <include>org.apache.jackrabbit:jackrabbit-data</include>
oak-pojosr/pom.xml
106: <artifactId>jackrabbit-data</artifactId>
{noformat}
> move jackrabbit-data into Oak
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-8840
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8840
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: blob
> Reporter: Julian Reschke
> Priority: Major
>
> jackrabbit-data is one of the few remaining dependencies on Jackrabbit. It
> would be good to move this into the Oak project, so it can evolve at Oak's
> speed.
> [~amitj], [~mreutegg], [~mattvryan] - what do you think?
> In particular, are there parts in jackrabbit-data which should stay over
> there? For instance, I assumed that DB-backed data stores aren't used in Oak,
> but then found out about {{DbDataStoreService}}. Maybe a cleanup is needed
> first?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
