mån 2013-01-28 klockan 20:48 +0100 skrev Daniel Pocock: > > On 28/01/13 20:30, Simon Josefsson wrote: > > Daniel Pocock <[email protected]> writes: > > > >> On 28/01/13 19:47, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> ACL dm: NEW uploads are not allowed > >>> > >>> === > >>> > >>> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why > >>> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our > >>> concerns. > >> > >> > >> 2.0.2-2 was accepted OK yesterday, can somebody please clarify the > >> meaning of the error? Is this because the uploader is DM? Why was the > >> package routed to the NEW queue when an existing version of the package > >> is already in the archive? > >> > >> http://packages.qa.debian.org/o/oath-toolkit.html > > > > It is because there are new binary packages in this upload. I'll ask > > Tollef (my sponsor) about it, a DD need to upload it. > > I'm happy to sponsor them as well now that I'm a DD, would you > potentially like to put them under pkg-auth maintainership for this > upload as well? Do you have access on alioth to put the repo there? > Then I can clone it and push tags when I upload.
The dpkg repo is here: https://gitorious.org/oath-toolkit/oath-toolkit-dpkg It has all the latest changes, so you could build it and maybe upload it. I don't really know how the DD/sponsor side works, so I'm cc'ing Tollef as well -- Tollef, do you want to do the upload for the NEW queue or could Daniel do it? I don't know if DD's "own" packages somehow. I must admit I have to catch up on the pkg-auth discussion after returning from vacation. I always found working with git/svn on alioth problematic for different reasons, and gitorious has worked very well. > Did Tollef give you DM access before the DM acl system was changed? Yep, the recent 2.0.2-1 and 2.0.2-2 uploads worked via the new acl system. Tollef gave me permission recently. /Simon
