You wrote: > On 12/02/14 02:16, Simon Josefsson wrote: > > I think it looked fine but I haven't fully analyzed it -- any chance > > someone could come up with a brief description of how to reproduce > > the problem exactly? Then I could add that recipe as a self-test > > in the package, apply the fix, and if that silences the self-test, > > I'm happy. > I think my first email (9 Dec 11:31 GMT) contains a fairly detailed > description of how to reproduce this behaviour. Please let me know if > you need additional info.
Thank you for the pointer! With that I believe I'll be able to reproduce it and write a self-check for it. The bug is indeed in the library, not in the PAM module itself. Stay tuned.. /Simon
