Den Tue, 19 May 2015 22:53:05 +0100
skrev Re: OATH Toolkit 2.6.0:

> On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 23:24 +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> > Yeah, an URI approach sounds better.  There is a PKCS#11 amendment
> > for OTP tokens, not sure if the PKCS#11 URI handles this, or wheter
> > it makes any sense though.
> 
> I don't think the PKCS#11 URI covers that even for tokens which really
> are in a PKCS#11 device, let alone other things.

So, another kind of URL?

otp:hotp-pskc?h=sha1&file=/var/lib/foo/bar4711.pskc
otp:totp?h=sha1&key=010203040506070809000A0B0C0D0E0F
otp:hotp-ykneo?h=sha1&id='Facebook'
otp:stoken?...

Just brainstorming, I still don't see exactly how it all would fit
together.

/Simon

Attachment: pgpe5TWd1NiNT.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur

Reply via email to