On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Ivan Kirigin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I recently integrated Twitter's OAuth into my site, http://tipjoy.com
>
> It's a great user experience and a lot like Facebook Connect.
>
> But I ran into a problem when developing our API for Twitter
> applications to use Tipjoy for payments. OAuth tokens aren't
> transferable like a username & password. For example, a Twitter user
> on TweetDeck can input a username & password, which lets TweetDeck
> post a picture to TwitPic. If TweetDeck were granted OAuth access to
> the user's Twitter account, TwitPic couldn't verify the access tokens
> easily, and couldn't communicate to Twitter with them.
>
> How can we power this 4-legged OAuth? Twitter could act as an
> intermediary, to tell TwitPic that the request from TweetDeck is
> authorized.

Aha. This is delegation, something I wanted to put into OAuth first
time round but, well, there was resistance :-)

I believe the IETF are also interested in delegation.

>
> I'm told Facebook is coming up with a solution for Facebook Connect.
> As the environment for social apps becomes more connected, this
> communication between 3rd parties about users on the OAuth provider
> become more important.
>
> What do you all think?
>
> Thanks,
> Ivan
> http://tipjoy.com
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OAuth" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to