Monotonical-increasing timestamp is not even possible in almost
perfect conditions. We were hitting our servers using JMeter running
on 2 boxes in the same data center and all our machines are synced
with NTP. Just flipping a few pages through the log and I saw a case
where timestamps are out of order.

Zhihong

On Apr 16, 2:06 am, Manish Pandit <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Apr 15, 10:54 pm, Mike Malone <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Depending on your use case that may work, but in practice I think loosening
> > up the constraint requiring timestamps to be monotonically increasing makes
> > sense. Sometimes it is convenient to generate URIs for later use, and other
> > requests may be executed between the time such URIs are created and the time
> > a request is made to the URI.
>
> > Also, if you have a consumer key that is used across many devices (e.g., a
> > desktop or mobile app, or a web app with multiple servers) there could be
> > any number of reasons why request A may arrive after request B despite being
> > signed earlier (e.g., clock drift or shoddy internet connectivity).
>
> > So I'd say that strictly enforcing the timestamp constraint will probably be
> > a problem... and since the nonce optimization you described relies on
> > enforcement of the timestamp constraint I think it may not work in practice.
>
> > Mike
>
> Outch..totally forgot about the desktop/mobile clients where a lot of
> requests could come in with the same consumer key..thanks so much!
>
> -cheers,
> Manish
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OAuth" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to