Hi Alex, If you have any suggestion on what to do with our OAuth Library (Madgex http://code.goole.com/p/oauth-dot-net/) I'd like to hear about it. Any ideas on what it's lacking / needing always welcome.
Chris On Apr 21, 12:09 am, Alex Henderson <[email protected]> wrote: > OAuthBase.cs is a buggy/flawed implementation - I would suggest looking at > one of these 3 options for OAuth on the .Net Framework - also check out > Owen's experience with the OAuthBase.cs class here, which you might find > interesting: > > http://bgeek.net/2009/03/03/oauth-mvcnet-revisited/ > > There are a few options I know of at current: > > Madgex's OAuth Library > -http://lab.madgex.com/oauth-net/&http://code.google.com/p/oauth-dot-net/ > DevDefined Tools OAuth Library > -http://code.google.com/p/devdefined-tools/wiki/OAuth > DotNetOpenAuth (OpenId and OAuth) > -http://github.com/AArnott/dotnetopenid/tree/master > > None are ideal at this stage IMO (I wrote the second one and have dug around > the code in the other two) - but they are all better starting points then > OAuthBase.cs. > > Cheers, > > - Alex > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Kevin M <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I'm having an issue where I'm POSTing data to a page using x-www-form- > > urlencoded parameters. The string I'm posting looks just like a normal > > query string and I'm writing this data directly to the Stream obtained > > from the HttpWebRequest object. > > > So my problem lies directly with the GenerateSignatureBase method > > call. Since this extra data is posted in the body and not included in > > the query string, the call to GenerateSignatureBase does not take > > these parameters into account. The server side code (Java library) > > does take these posted parameters into account when creating the > > signatureBase (as it should based on the spec). > > > Any ideas? I've tried hacking it a bit by appending my data to the URL > > as a query string (will not work long term) and not posting the data > > in the body and that worked, sort of. But this is not the appropriate > > way to do this. > > > Kevin M > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OAuth" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
