Dossy Shiobara wrote: > On 4/30/09 7:19 AM, Blaine Cook wrote: > >> Looks good, with the exception of the 'oob' value – why not just say >> that an empty OR absent callback parameter fulfills the same role as >> 'oob'? There are also plenty of service providers that require static >> configuration of the callback, and in those cases the callback >> parameter would be absent when obtaining the request token. >> > > I'm guessing Eran's concern was being able to differentiate between a > 1.0 consumer vs. a 1.0A consumer. Having an absent callback parameter > could be either. > >
Wouldn't that be the purpose of the oauth_version parameter? I also think it would be a good idea to include an appendix section that summarizes the changes between 1.0 and (1.0a or 1.1 whichever it be). Rob --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OAuth" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
