That is an implementation detail. I am not sure how helpful it would be to have 
a security consideration section about limiting the number of allowed token 
exchange requests for a single request token.

EHL

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> Of Hubert Le Van Gong
> Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 3:26 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [oauth] Re: Request for new Security Considerations text
> 
> 
> If I remember correctly, we also talked of recommending or mandating
> one-time request tokens.
> 
> Hubert
> 
> 
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > We have identified a few new attack vectors since the spec was
> originally written and would like to address them in the Security
> Consideration section. Please reply with proposals for such texts.
> Ideally we can reach some consensus on these by Fri, but if not, we can
> add it a bit later since it doesn't affect the protocol directly.
> >
> > EHL
> >
> > >
> >
> 
> 

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OAuth" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to