It is really just using the authentication method without an oauth_token. When we clean up the authentication part and address the requirement of coming up with a new authentication method for HTTP, this will be made clear.
EHL > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Peter Saint-Andre > Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 9:36 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [oauth] Re: Is there a spec for 2-legged OAuth? > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 7/3/09 11:29 AM, Andrew Arnott wrote: > > It seems like 2-legged OAuth is this informal thing that everyone > knows > > about yet I can't find any concrete documentation on. Is it because > > when it exists, it's a proprietary solution between a consumer and > SP? > > Is there a spec anywhere? > > I'm hoping that Eran will talk about this in the Internet-Draft he > plans > to submit about the delegation workflows. > > Peter > > - -- > Peter Saint-Andre > https://stpeter.im/ > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iEYEARECAAYFAkpSJ9YACgkQNL8k5A2w/vwdGgCg/PveXiY7A+UmX9Y6fRPfAp33 > RcwAoLJYWQlLvKTFQEV/CZNzWaBtD8Qh > =CcHo > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OAuth" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
