-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

http://wiki.oauth.net/ProblemReporting has timestamp_refused (and also
verifier_invalid), but it unclear about the mapping between those more
specific conditions and the generic HTTP conditions. IMHO this needs to
be clarified in draft-ietf-oauth-authentication as the specs are worked
on in the Oauth WG:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-authentication-01

http://tools.ietf.org/wg/oauth/

Peter

On 8/22/09 10:24 PM, Doug Kaye wrote:
> Same question for bad timestamps. The spec (paragraph 10) says
> timestamps must be >= previous timestamps but there's no HTTP 400/401
> string for this.
> 
> On Aug 22, 7:59 pm, Doug Kaye <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Spec 6.3.2 (service provider processing of access token request) says
>> to return an HTTP error if the oauth_verifier is bad. But Spec
>> paragraph 10 indicates neither whether a 400 or 401 should be returned
>> nor an appropriate text string. What is expected?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkqW3lcACgkQNL8k5A2w/vzemgCfdD+U1bGQsvbbph7bG/hLDVhW
8PwAoLWDCJpvUPzVbvXplUtXsU+qel9n
=an20
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OAuth" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to