hi morten, thanks for your reply.
i recognise that there's nothing 'missing' from the library but it requires a fair bit of complimentary coding to be done in order to implement it, hence 'there are a few gaps to fill', however i can appreciate your point regarding the hooks and data-storage. what about 1.0a, does it support that yet? if not do you know if anyone's developing a patch for it? rob On Nov 12, 3:36 pm, Morten Fangel <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > There is nothing "missing" in thehttp://oauth.googlecode.com/svn/code/php/ > library to implement either a consumer or a service-provider.. > > Obviously you need to code up your own data-storage and add in the > hooks at the pages you want to be your endpoints, but this is just so > you have full flexibility or where and how do to stuff.. > > For a fully working sample implementation of a service-provider, you > can see the code for my OAuth Playgroundhttp://github.com/fangel/oauth-sandbox > > Specifically the > data-storage:http://github.com/fangel/oauth-sandbox/blob/master/library/DataStorag... > and the end-points > page:http://github.com/fangel/oauth-sandbox/blob/master/api.php > > -- > > I need to fix a bug related to interoperability with Joe Stumps Python > library, after which I will get all my patches submitted.. I just need > to have some free time to do it.. > > -Morten > > On Nov 12, 2009, at 3:54 AM, rob ganly wrote: > > > > > hi all, > > > i'm currently implementing the version that joseph mentioned, i.e. > >http://oauth.googlecode.com/svn/code/php/ > > > i need to implement both a consumer and a provider. obviously the most > > involved part is creating the provider. > > > obviously there are a few gaps to fill in the above library before it > > can be fully implemented and it is a bit of a worry that it has pretty > > stagnant for 6 months (although i note morten's comments on recent > > activity). however seeing as it doesn't yet support 1.0a and requires > > some extra coding in order to do so i think that i might actually > > switch to using the other lib that joseph > > mentioned:http://code.google.com/p/oauth-php/ > > > it seems there's still the lack of a distinct leading library complete > > with documentation and examples. > > > thus, i'd be interested in learning what lib. people would choose if > > they personally were implementing both a provider and a consumer? > > > best, > > > rob ganly > > > On Nov 11, 7:54 pm, Nicholas Granado <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I don't know if anyone has mentioned EpiOAuth. > > >>http://github.com/jmathai/twitter-async > > >> --- > >> Nicholas Granado > >> twitter: heatxsink > >> web: http://nickgranado.com > >> email: [email protected] > > >> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Melvin Carvalho > >> <[email protected]>wrote: > > >>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:58 PM, camilo_u <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > > >>>> There is a Zend Framework proposal currently testing called > >>>> Zend_OAuth: > > >>>>http://framework.zend.com/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=37957 > > >>>> You can take a look at the code here: > > >>>http://framework.zend.com/svn/framework/standard/incubator/library/Ze > >>> ... > > >>>> One of the proposer, Pádraic Brady, has a sample implementation > >>>> with > >>>> Twitter: > > >>>http://blog.astrumfutura.com/archives/411-Writing-A-Simple-Twitter-Cl > >>> ... > > >>> Also recently came across this twitter impl. also on github > > >>>http://github.com/abraham/twitteroauth > > >>>> As far as i know it's ready with the OAuth Core 1.0 Revision A, and > >>>> hopefully it will be availabe on the Zend Framwork 1.10, so this > >>>> will > >>>> be a very common library soon. > > >>>> Regards, > > >>>> Camilo Usuga > > >>>> On 10 nov, 16:56, Jeff Hodsdon <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> There is also a PEAR library,http://pear.php.net/package/HTTP_OAuth > >>>>> , > >>>>> which has classes for being a provider. > > >>>>> -jeff > >>>>> On Nov 6, 2009, at 8:21 AM, Joseph Smarr wrote: > > >>>>>> Thanks Morten. I'd really encourage you to finish up those > >>>>>> patches > >>>>>> and submit them, since I think a lot of people do use that OAuth > >>>>>> library. I'm happy to do a code review or otherwise take a look > >>>>>> at > >>>>>> it if that's useful to you. > > >>>>>> Thanks, js > > >>>>>> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 12:34 AM, Morten Fangel < > >>> [email protected] > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> Hi, > > >>>>>> I did some of the most recent patches on thehttp:// > >>> oauth.googlecode.com/svn/code/php/ > >>>>>> library.. And speaking of two-legged and rev. a. - I actually > >>>>>> have > >>>>>> done work on those, I just haven't had time to finish up on the > >>>>>> work > >>>>>> (but they are running on the OAuth Sandbox which can be found > >>> athttp://oauth-sandbox.sevengoslings.net > >>>>>> - so it does work) > > >>>>>> Just to let people know that the library isn't dead.. ;) > > >>>>>> -Morten > > >>>>>> On Nov 5, 2009, at 9:49 PM, Joseph Smarr wrote: > > >>>>>>> It seems like there are several actively maintained PHP OAuth > >>>>>>> libraries, and it's not clear to me which are most up-to-date > >>>>>>> and/ > >>>>>>> or widely used. The oauth.net/code page mainly featureshttp:// > >>> oauth.googlecode.com/svn/code/php/ > >>>>>>> which hasn't been updated since May 18, 2009. There's > >>>>>>> alsohttp:// > >>> code.google.com/p/oauth-php/ > >>>>>>> which looks more complicated but also more up-to-date. And > >>>>>>> there's > >>>>>>> alsohttp://pecl.php.net/oauthwhichisa C extension for OAuth > >>>>>>> that it looks like Rasmus et al have bene updating recently. > > >>>>>>> Personally, I like (and use) > >>>http://oauth.googlecode.com/svn/code/php/ > >>>>>>> because it's simple (just one file), and I believe shindig-php > >>>>>>> uses it too, but I don't think it has support for OAuth 1.0a > >>>>>>> or two- > >>>>>>> legged OAuth, both of which are very standard now. I also recall > >>>>>>> fixing a bunch of bugs in it that may or may not have ever > >>>>>>> landed > >>>>>>> in the tree. > > >>>>>>> So, should I add 1.0a and 2-legged support to this lib? If so, > >>>>>>> will > >>>>>>> someone review and patch it and/or make me a committer? Has > >>>>>>> anyone > >>>>>>> else already made these updates and just not shared it back? > >>>>>>> Or is > >>>>>>> one of these other libraries now the "de facto standard PHP > >>>>>>> lib", > >>>>>>> in which case shouldn't it be listed on oauth.net/code under > >>>>>>> PHP? > > >>>>>>> Thanks, js > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OAuth" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
