How do people feel about adding a note at the top of:

http://oauth.net/core/1.0
http://oauth.net/core/1.0a

Pointing visitors to the OAuth Core 1.0 RFC draft (pending IESG approval):

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hammer-oauth

The new draft is significantly better and easier to read. We can't switch the 
content at the two URIs above because they are linked to the IPR agreements. We 
also shouldn't because those specs represent a community product that should be 
kept for future documentation and many existing links point there.

For those not paying attention, the new draft also contains a few protocol 
changes and clarifications which may have a small impact in existing libraries. 
For the list of changes:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hammer-oauth-07#appendix-A

Comments?

EHL

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OAuth" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en.


Reply via email to