Konnichiwa Kudo-san, as reported on top of the page <http://oauth.net/core/1.0a/>, "Implementers should use draft-hammer-oauth instead of this specification." so you've to take <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hammer-oauth> as the reference. All the best, sayounara Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 1:43 AM, tkudo <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > A colleague of mine is planning to translate the latest OAuth > specification to Japanese and make it to public, and wondering which > version is appropriate, <http://oauth.net/core/1.0a/> or <http:// > tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hammer-oauth>. > Can anyone comment on this? > > Thanks, > Tatsuo. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "OAuth" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OAuth" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en.
