>> Yes, thanks. Is there a special reason for that? I guess at least
it shouldn't exit with an Internal Error...

It is a new feature which hasn't been finalized/documented/announced.  So it
obviously needs a little bit more polish :-)

On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Leslie P. Polzer
<[email protected]>wrote:

> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 10:43:37AM -0700, Eric Sachs wrote:
> > >> with or without OAuth login credentials returns "Internal error".
> > We currently only accept OAuth parameters (signature etc.) in the
> > Authorization: header. Could that be it?
>
> Yes, thanks. Is there a special reason for that? I guess at least it
> shouldn't exit with an Internal Error...
>
>  Leslie
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "OAuth" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected] <oauth%[email protected]>.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OAuth" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en.

Reply via email to