Jeff, it works fine as long as the service can validate the client cert.
-----Original message-----
From: [email protected]
To: Digest Recipients <[email protected]>
Sent: Fri, Jun 3, 2011 17:59:09 GMT+00:00
Subject: [oauth] Digest for [email protected] - 1 Message in 1 Topic
=============================================================================
Today's Topic Summary
=============================================================================
Group: [email protected]
Url: http://groups.google.com/group/oauth/topics
- Signing problems with RSA-SHA1 [1 Update]
http://groups.google.com/group/oauth/t/252c9581b8d5f8ee
=============================================================================
Topic: Signing problems with RSA-SHA1
Url: http://groups.google.com/group/oauth/t/252c9581b8d5f8ee
=============================================================================
---------- 1 of 1 ----------
From: Jeff <[email protected]>
Date: Jun 02 02:41PM -0500
Url: http://groups.google.com/group/oauth/msg/995830a3320ee5dc
Thanks Tim! But the question then remains -- is there a problem with
RSA-SHA1? We have this in our own spec we are obliged to use and if it
does not work, I need to know this asap.
Cheers,
Jeff
On 06/01/2011 09:49 PM, Tim wrote:
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"OAuth" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"OAuth" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en.
