Hey Eran! On Jan 9, 2010, at 12:12 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
[...] (sure, agreed) > My proposed language would be along the lines of "MUST use a secure channel > such as TLS/SSL or another mechanism providing the same protections". This > allows not using TLS/SSL when the environment provides the same protections > some other way. Your wording looks good to me. Cheers, - johnk > > EHL > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "OAuth" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en. > > _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
