On 2010-04-06, at 12:16 AM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote: > > > > On 4/2/10 3:27 PM, "Dick Hardt" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> There are times when a resource may have different scope for different kinds >> of access. realm != scope > > No. Realm is a subset. It is what people define as the protected segment > name.
Different Protected Resources could require the same scope, so I see realm and scope as being orthogonal. > For any other scope attribute we need to first define it. Why? Scope will often be application specific. _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
