+1 to #1 On 2010-04-18, at 9:35 PM, Luke Shepard wrote: > > 1/ We leave the scope parameter as an Auth Server-specific, opaque parameter. > 2/ We all agree on a format and spec for the scope parameter. > 3/ We drop the scope parameter and make each server define their own, > non-standard scope param. > > I think David proposed #2 as a way to address concerns on this list that #1 > would be a hindrance to interop. But I personally vote for #1 now - we would > add a spec later if it proves to be a problem. > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
