Hi Paul, yes, we have 3 Apache people (me, you, Simone Tripodi), one Apache contributor with filed CLA (Pid) that want to contribute his code base, and received some interest from other people, so I think we could start preparing an Incubator proposal. You can have a look at Simone Tripodi's proposal for the Amber lab that can be a good starting point.
Anyone else on OAuth list is interested? Simone 2010/4/21 Paul Lindner <[email protected]> > Ditto here. Apache Shindig uses OAuth extensively and we would like to > upgrade it to OAuth 2.0. The current stable java oauth library is okay, but > does not have an active developer community, and isn't even published to > maven central. > > I just had a peek at Amber, looks fairly decent. I can help move this to > Apache incubating if people are interested. > > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Simone Gianni <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Pid, >> I'm also interested in developing a Java library for OAuth 2. There is an >> Apache Lab (labs.apache.org , lab named Amber) working on an OAuth 1 Java >> API, it could (will) eventually move to Incubator if we manage to get enough >> momentum. >> >> It would be nice to have a Java API that integrates with existing systems, >> like JAAS and Spring Security (formerly known as Acegi). That would ease the >> migration for all the frameworks and existing systems that already use those >> libraries. >> >> Simone >> >> 2010/4/15 Pid <[email protected]> >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I'm interested in working with other Java programmers to develop a >>> standardised API for OAuth 2.0. >>> >>> I have reviewed the recent archives, but don't see anything in the way >>> of discussion on this topic. If anyone can point me to a location where >>> it is being discussed I'd be grateful. >>> >>> >>> I think it would be good if the OAuth community was able to agree a spec >>> and then for implementors to have something to focus their efforts >>> against, instead of produced many different and incompatible libraries. >>> >>> There are obviously challenges in attempting this before the v2.0 itself >>> is final, but perhaps the effort will inform the overall debate. >>> >>> >>> The different Java implementations of OAuth version 1.0 each have >>> varying features and levels of complexity. Most implementations focus >>> on the client component and don't provide server components at all. >>> I'd like to improve on that in a Java API. >>> >>> Some ideas I have include specifying that, in addition to programmatical >>> configuration, an implementation should allow ServiceLoader and XML >>> based configurations, and perhaps even an Annotation based config. >>> >>> >>> I'd like to hear from anyone who'd be interested in combining efforts, >>> Java programmer or not. >>> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> >>> Pid >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OAuth mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> >> >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
