On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Joseph Smarr <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Any reason that wouldn't work?

Form encoding allows duplicate keys. So, transforming such message
bodies to JSON should be defined.

But, really, I think the group should just pick one and avoid the
hassle. I would pick JSON, since JSON implementations bring reasonable
Unicode conformance.

-- 

Robert Sayre

"I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time."
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to