On 2010-05-09, at 2:06 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:

> DEADLINE: 5/13
> 
> I would like to publish one more draft before our interim meeting in two 
> weeks (5/20). Below are two open issues we have on the list. Please reply 
> with your preference (or additional solutions) to each item. Issues with 
> consensus will be incorporated into the next draft. Those without will be 
> discussed at the meeting.
> 
> EHL
> 
> ---
> 
> 1. Server Response Format
> 
> After extensive debate, we have a large group in favor of using JSON as the 
> only response format (current draft). We also have a smaller group but with 
> stronger feelings on the subject that JSON adds complexity with no obvious 
> value.
> 
> A. Form-encoded only (original draft)
> B. JSON only (current draft)
> C. JSON as default with form-encoded and XML available with an optional 
> request parameter

I vote for B

I would argue that form-encoded data adds complexity with no obvious value.

*If* a JSON parser is not available, parsing the JSON that is returned is not 
that much different from parsing form-encoded data (remember that we are only 
using a very small subset of JSON)

More and more sites are returning both JSON and XML. Eventually everyone will 
see the light wrt. JSON ;-)

> 
> ---
> 
> 2. Client Authentication (in flows)
> 
> How should the client authenticate when making token requests? The current 
> draft defines special request parameters for sending client credentials. Some 
> have argued that this is not the correct way, and that the client should be 
> using existing HTTP authentication schemes to accomplish that such as Basic.
> 
> A. Client authenticates by sending its credentials using special parameters 
> (current draft)
> B. Client authenticated by using HTTP Basic (or other schemes supported by 
> the server such as Digest)

C. support both flows in the spec. An AS can decide what it wants to support. I 
would like to retain A as it may be challenging for some clients to use HTTP 
Basic, and easier for an AS to be always parsing parameters for each flow. I 
can see the advantages for some in using HTTP Basic.

-- Dick


_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to