+1 > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Brian Eaton > Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 4:11 PM > To: Manger, James H > Cc: OAuth WG ([email protected]) > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] sites with wildcard > > On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Manger, James H > <[email protected]> wrote: > > HTTP Digest uses (A) [A. List of URI prefixes]. (A) is a pretty good > > match to how Google uses scope values. > > It's not, actually. Our scopes are sometimes URI prefixes, and sometimes are > not. The reality is complicated, and to be honest is poorly documented. > We're working on it. > > As I've said in a few other e-mail threads, I think it would be a serious > mistake > to publish a standard that doesn't reflect things that are already deployed in > the wild and are well-understood. > > If people want to see systems that automatically determines scopes and > reuses tokens, I think they should go and build those systems. Then come > back to the community with explanations of what they did, and why other > people should adopt it. > > Cheers, > Brian > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
