On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> What?
>
> Basic auth seems to be working just fine for the entire web...

I hadn't heard of implementations hitting a limitation on header size,
but Basic and Digest are both broken.

Basic leaves the input character encoding unspecified, so it doesn't
handle anything but ASCII in an interoperable way. OAuth
implementations will certainly screw this up too, but I suspect it
will be somewhat less buggy, since most people will probably just
guess it's supposed to be UTF-8.

The way Digest hashes credentials is incompatible with pretty much
every authentication database, so it never gets used, and it isn't
very secure anyway.

What /would/ be nice is an HTTP authentication scheme that used some
sort of PAKE... but don't gate the OAuth spec on that.

-- 

Robert Sayre

"I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time."
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to