Not sure what you are referring to.

EHL

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nat [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 4:42 PM
> To: Eran Hammer-Lahav
> Cc: OAuth WG ([email protected])
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Status update
> 
> What about the 'request_url' indirection (without sig and enc)?
> 
> On 2010/06/18, at 6:36, Eran Hammer-Lahav <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > With the exception of extensibility, I consider draft -08 to be
> > feature complete. This means that the draft contains all the features
> > and components needed and other then editorial work is close to
> > finished. I plan to finish work on the -09 draft by Mon or Tue next
> > week which will include the extensibility text, additional editorial
> > work, and resolution of the proposal to simplify the end- user
> > authorization endpoint. At that point, I intend to ask for an interim
> > last-call on the normative language (i.e. the implementation details).
> >
> >
> >
> > Note that this last-call isn't really a WG last call. The spec can c
> > hange after that. But it will be a useful milestone to figure out if
> > the draft's implementation details are stable and can be considered
> > complete.
> >
> >
> >
> > All of this of course requires the approval of the chairs.
> >
> >
> >
> > EHL
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OAuth mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to