If we have both error_code and error_description, why is an error_uri needed? (I'm not finding anything when I search the list for 'error_uri'.)
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav <[email protected]> wrote: > There was also a suggestion by Brian to add an error_uri for additional > information. > > I'm happy to include all three. > > EHL > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Marius Scurtescu [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 1:00 PM >> To: Eran Hammer-Lahav >> Cc: OAuth WG ([email protected]) >> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last call for feedback on -08 >> >> There was a suggestion to expand the 'error' parameter to two different >> parameters: >> - error_code - well defined list of error codes >> - error_description - authz server specific free form error description (for >> logging and troubleshooting) >> >> Not sure if you considered this. >> >> Marius >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I am working on -09 which I hope will be the last major revision of >> > the specification. If you were planning on submitting any feedback on >> > draft -08 or the simplification proposal from David and me, please do >> > so by tomorrow to be included in the next draft. >> > >> > >> > >> > EHL >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > OAuth mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
