On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:42 AM, William Mills <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Marius Scurtescu [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 11:36 AM >> To: Eran Hammer-Lahav >> Cc: William Mills; Rob Richards; [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Versioning >> >> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Eran Hammer-Lahav >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > If you would like to discuss a version for the header, >> please provide examples and requirements for what changes in >> the future you would like to support. >> >> Not sure about the future, but looking at OAuth 1 vs OAuth 2. >> A protected resource request filter may want to decide early >> what protocol it deals with so it can call the appropriate >> handler, or to enforce HTTPS for OAuth 2 for example. Sure, >> it can apply heuristics right now, but it would be nice to >> have a more deterministic way which can also be extended in >> the future. You can always embed the protocol version inside >> the token I guess, so I don't think this is a huge issue. > > Yeah, unfortunately early selection of a handler might require peeking into > the post body.
Is anybody really using or needing this feature? Can we drop this option? Marius _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
