Section 2 talked about how the client authenticates itself. This is used in the 
token endpoint but can be used elsewhere (i.e. A device profile).

EHL


On 7/3/10 5:42 PM, "Andrew Arnott" <[email protected]> wrote:

It may be my misreading the spec, or making assumptions based on my cluttered 
mind from reading the various drafts, so apologies if I'm just confused, but...

Section 2 seems to be just sitting there.  No discussion on how it fits into 
the spec from what I can see.  It doesn't discuss how to obtain a grant, or 
access token, or anything.  It also mentions type=web-server, which is an 
obsolete parameter.

Section 4.1 has a grant_type=none option, which seems to cover the same 
scenario as Section 2 (did).  I take it that section 4.1 is sort of the "2 
legged OAuth" scenario.  Am I correct in this?

--
Andrew Arnott
"I [may] not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your 
right to say it." - S. G. Tallentyre

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to