On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav <[email protected]> wrote: > It is pretty much the same as originally proposed. Any recent changes are an > oversight, not any intentional change. Since it was proposed, the only > change made (with full consensus) was to allow client authentication as an > optional request parameter, as well as allow a refresh token as an optional > response parameter.
Can you point me to the e-mail threads that reached consensus on using client authentication? Can you point me to the e-mail threads that reached consensus on returning a refresh token? _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
