On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 with the exception of a new scheme name for signatures. I think we need > to get to a stable draft before we can figure it out.
Very reasonable. > But I would like to > keep the core spec open for (small) changes until we do. > > I added this to -10: > > Authorization: OAuth <token> [optional extension key=”value” pairs] Sure. Hopefully we never need the key="value" stuff. _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
